Sensefold vs wallabag: run your own archive, or a hosted Markdown library your own AI can read and write
wallabag has outlived a decade of read-later apps — Pocket and Omnivore included — because it is open source and answers to nobody’s acquisition. It is also deliberately simple: articles in, keyword search out, no AI anywhere, and an API for the clients and scripts you write. Sensefold is the opposite bet: a hosted library where every capture — pages, threads, videos, ChatGPT or Claude chats — becomes Markdown with an automatic summary and tags, and Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client reads and writes it. Here is the honest comparison, with the export row wallabag users will rightly ask about.
Last reviewed by Sensefold Editorial.wallabag facts come from wallabag.org (including the March 2026 iOS app notice), wallabag.it (pricing), and github.com/wallabag/wallabag (latest 2.6.14, October 2025; active in September 2026), checked September 2026. If you spot something outdated, tell us and we will fix it. Visit wallabag: wallabag.org
Sensefold vs wallabag, feature by feature
A check marks the side that is stronger on that row; no mark means the two differ without one being better.
| Feature |  Sensefold | wallabag |
|---|---|---|
| Data ownership & export | Hosted service, private to your account — and portable: the library is Markdown, exportable as a ZIP from the web app at any time; copy any capture as Markdown from the extension or iOS. | Server is MIT open source; self-host it and the archive is entirely yours. Bulk export to ePUB, PDF, JSON, CSV, and TXT; imports from Pocket, Instapaper, and Omnivore. |
| Setup required | Sign up and save — nothing to install or maintain. | Self-hosting needs a PHP server stack; wallabag.it hosting removes that for €11/year. |
| Automatic enrichment on save | Automatic on every capture: summary, tags, OCR for images and PDFs, chapter guides for video. Your own notes are indexed but never rewritten by Sensefold’s AI. | None by design — rule-based auto-tagging only. RSS and email-to-save are funded for a future release (June 2026); still no AI. |
| Your own AI, connected | Any MCP client — Claude, ChatGPT, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenClaw, Hermes — connects at api.sensefold.app/mcp with OAuth or a read_only / edit / full Agent key; tools include search_hub, get_item, save_link, save_note, update_note, and update_tags, with versioned, revertible writes. | A REST API with client libraries, aimed at wallabag clients and scripts; no MCP server. |
| File types | Web pages, PDFs, images (OCR), YouTube pages with transcript and chapter guide, social threads with comments, your own notes, and AI chats captured with the Chrome extension. | Web articles only — no PDF or image ingestion, no OCR. |
| Platforms today | Web app, iPhone and iPad app, Chrome extension, and Apple Silicon Mac app. | Web, Android (open source), iOS (closed-source with paid features since v7.6, April 2026), browser extensions, and e-reader integrations. |
| Pricing | No free tier: saving is free, AI runs on credits. Starter $16/month ($160/year), Pro $36/month ($396/year), after a 14-day free trial (card required). | Self-host free; wallabag.it is €4 for 3 months or €11/year, with a 14-day trial that needs no card and ends without a charge. |
Why people pick Sensefold over wallabag
- Enrichment wallabag will never add: summaries, tags, OCR, and transcripts on every capture; wallabag is keyword search over raw articles.
- More than articles: PDFs, screenshots, YouTube transcripts, threads with replies, notes, and ChatGPT or Claude chats, all searchable.
- Your own AI, connected over MCP: Claude or ChatGPT calls search_hub and get_item, cites the item it read, and writes notes back with versioned edits.
- Zero maintenance and still portable: no server to run, and a Markdown ZIP whenever you want it.
Moving from wallabag to Sensefold
Sensefold has no importer. wallabag exports clean JSON or CSV (per entry or in bulk), and a self-hosted instance holds everything in its database. Export and keep the files.
Re-save the articles you still need with the Chrome extension or the iOS share sheet, or give an edit-tier agent the URL list and ask it to call save_link for each; Sensefold captures the page, writes a summary and tags, and stores Markdown. Each capture spends credits on enrichment, so batch a large archive or run it on Starter rather than through the 800 trial credits. Annotations and wallabag tags do not migrate automatically; an agent can reapply tags with update_tags.
Who should stay on wallabag: anyone for whom self-hosting is the point — a €11/year hosted plan or a Raspberry Pi in a cupboard, an archive nobody else can delete, and an API for scripts. Sensefold makes sense when the archive should also be readable by your AI without you writing the glue: captured as Markdown, enriched automatically, and exposed over MCP with governed writes.
Related guides
Sensefold vs wallabag: frequently asked questions
Is Sensefold a wallabag alternative?
They serve different priorities. If open source and self-hosted ownership are non-negotiable, wallabag is the best project in the category and costs almost nothing. Sensefold is the fit when you want captures — including AI chats, threads, and videos — enriched automatically and readable and writable by your own AI over MCP, with no server to run.
Does Sensefold have an API like wallabag?
Sensefold’s programmatic surface is MCP rather than a REST API: any MCP client connects at api.sensefold.app/mcp with OAuth or a read_only, edit, or full Agent key and calls search_hub, list_items, get_item, save_link, save_note, update_note, update_tags, or delete_item. wallabag’s REST API is the better fit for custom scripts and third-party clients.
Is wallabag cheaper than Sensefold?
Yes, dramatically: self-hosting is free and wallabag.it is €11/year with a card-free trial. Sensefold has no free tier: saving is free, AI runs on credits, and Starter is $16/month after a 14-day trial that requires a card. The credits pay for automatic enrichment and for MCP access on every plan.
Why choose a hosted app after Pocket and Omnivore shut down?
It is the strongest argument for wallabag. The honest answer is portability: choose a hosted service only if you can leave with your data. Sensefold’s library is Markdown and exports as a ZIP from the web app today, so the risk is a re-import elsewhere, not a lost archive. Hosted trades shutdown risk for managed enrichment and no operations work; choose the risk you would rather carry.
Can I move my wallabag archive into Sensefold?
There is no importer. Export JSON or CSV from wallabag, keep it, and re-save the pages you still need with the extension, the iOS share sheet, or an edit-tier agent calling save_link.